Saturday, November 16, 2019

TELL Specialist M4: Task 5-Assignment

Updated: Since writing this back in the first decade of 2000's, I have experienced a lot more, seen both positive and negatives to what I talked about here (back then) and what I really envision for an ELL/ESL/ELD program. 
If you would like to hear what this looks like at Huamei International School (Offshore Canadian High School), feel free to reach out and engage in professional dialogue or potentially collaboration!
Check out and follow TPT account "Cbono90's Resources" for updates and insights into new approaches into ESL/ELL/ELD programing ressources!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional Development

One of the biggest barriers to effectively teaching English language learners can be lack of professional development and/or lack of school community support for ELL learners.

 For this assignment you will focus on the area of PD for teachers or on a school-wide initiative for the whole school community. The assignment focus should demonstrate how effective ESL and ELD programs are when we work collaboratively to support our ELL learners and be inclusive of everyone.

For this assignment you will reflect on all that you have learned throughout this course – through resources being introduced and through the collaborative dialogue and discussions that took place with your classmates and instructor.

As an ELL Specialist, your role is to respond to one of the following and present your assignment in a format of your own choosing.

Option A
Classroom teachers need support and to continue to learn effective strategies to support students’ language acquisition. Decide on PD you would like to convey to your school based on what an effective ESL and ELD program is comprised of. Think about your process and collaboration working as a group and the key important ideas and questions being asked. How would you effectively keep teachers in your school informed of ELL learning and practices and what would that PD look like?

Option B
What school-wide initiative could be planned for a school community, which would reflect and support your ELL learners? Consider how the event or program (whatever you present) would benefit the ELL learners, teachers and parents even. Consider the content discussed throughout the modules and reflect on why you chose the initiative you did.
______________________________________________________________
I am going to go with Option A as it seems to be the most beneficial to my future career. In presenting an initiative there are so many factors that will impact it and opportunities that will arise, it just seems too unnecessary for me because of the fact that when I start at a new school there will be so much to dive into-I don't think I'd ever have the chance to use it in the way I created it originally. However, it is very common that ELL programs are overlooked and put on a backburner in schools that don't have large ELL/ELD programs-plus to articulate what a functional program looks like, is extremely beneficial.

Option A, where to begin...
Documents presented in the course about ELL/ELD programs:

https://youtu.be/vrU6YJle6Q4
This is a video on "What makes a good teacher, Great." by Azul Terronez (TED Talk)
These are videos put out into the professional workspace by the OCT; they are basic reiteration of a teacher's basic standards/duties/expected ethics as a classroom teacher.
_____________________________________________________________________________

Good Example of a Program:

https://www.tdsb.on.ca/High-School/Your-School-Day/English-as-a-Second-Language

Bad Example of a Program:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. What is the purpose of an ELL/ELD program?

a) What is an English Language Learner?

"For the purposes of this policy, English language learners are students in provincially funded English language schools whose first language isa language other than English, or is a variety of English 1 that is significantly different from the variety used for instruction in Ontario’s schools, and who may require focused educational supports to assist them in attaining proficiency in English. These students may be Canadian born or recently arrived from other countries. They come from diverse backgrounds and school experiences, and have a wide variety of strengths and needs." (Ontario Education, Pg.7)


b) Goals of Program

"The implementation of this policy will result in a consistent approach to the education of English language learners across the province, while also affording the flexibility school boards need to meet their local needs, build capacity, and enhance program viability. The goal of Ontario’s policy for English language learners is to provide school boards with direction and support in meeting the needs of English language learners so that these students can develop the proficiency in English that is necessary for success in school. The policy will assist school boards in meeting these needs by:

• providing a definition of English language learners;
• describing effective procedures for reception, orientation,placement, and programming for English language learners, in order to accelerate their acquisition of English for academic purposes;
 • describing procedures for initial and ongoing assessment of English language learners and for reporting to parents;
• clarifying procedures for the identification of English language learners who are to participate in large-scale assessments;
 • defining the roles and responsibilities of teachers and administrators and providing opportunities for them to develop the skills they need to support English language learners effectively;
 • clarifying procedures for collecting data related to English language learners and for monitoring and tracking their progress, to support public accountability;
• describing procedures designed to support increased credit accumulation, graduation rates, and postsecondary enrolment among English language learners.

(Ontario Education, Page 10)

2. Who is involved in the process of placement?

a) Board Implementation/Framework

2.2 RECEPTION AND ORIENTATION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND THEIR FAMILIES

2.2.1a Parents will be made aware of the goal of ESL and ELD programs in Ontario schools and how they are of benefit to students who are developing proficiency in English.

(Ontario Education, Pg.15)

b) Reception and Orientation 

First impressions are important, and schools should provide a warm welcome for all English language learners and their families. 

Orientation programs should include: information about courses and about considerations related to course selection; explanation of programs and activities; explanation of school policies(including assessment, evaluation, and reporting policies and homework policies); explanation of the overall school structure, including the School Council’s role; and information about community activities and supports.

(Ontario Education, Pg. 15-16)

c) Registration 

Clear direction should be given to school staff to register all students of eligible school age, whether or not an ESL or ELD program is already in place, or to assist students to find an appropriate and accessible school placement where their needs as English language learners will be met.

(Ontario Education, Pg. 16)

2.3.1 School boards will assign staff to assess the English language proficiency of all English language learners. The assessment procedure will include: 
– a structured interview to assess oral communication skills (i.e., listening and speaking); 
– an assessment of reading comprehension; 
– an assessment of student writing; 
– an assessment of mathematical knowledge and skills. 

(Ontario Education, Pg. 18)
3. How are students placed?

a) Identification

The assessment should provide information about the type and amount of support the student will need to develop English language skills and bridge gaps in learning. Additional support should be provided through an intensive program designed to accelerate the student’s acquisition of proficiency in everyday and academic English and the appropriate knowledge and skills of literacy and numeracy.

(Ontario Education, Pg. 19)


The development of an Individual Education Plan (IEP) for an English language learner needs to take into consideration both needs related to language learning and needs related to the student’s exceptionality.

(Ontario Education, Pg. 19)

b) Placement

Placement decisions should be based on information from: – interviews with students and their parents/families about previous access to schooling; experiences in school, including type of schooling;migration history and family circumstances; health; the student’s strengths, hobbies, and interests; special needs and other related/potentially relevant information; 
– school documents, where available (e.g., report cards,school records); 
– Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR; see also Section 2.6.4) for credit-granting purposes (e.g., international language credits for first language proficiency); 
– an assessment of computational/procedural skills in mathematics (as an indicator of general academic experience).

(Ontario Education, Pg. 19-20)

Guidance counsellors should have discussions with English language learners in secondary schools about course selection in relation to the various pathways leading to the student’s postsecondary and career goals. As part of the ongoing process of developing an educational plan, teachers and guidance counsellors should help English language learners to identify their personal goals and strategies for learning English. It is also important for teachers and guidance counsellors to schedule frequent “check-ins” with English language learners to monitor their academic achievement, participation in extracurricular activities, and social adjustment.

(Ontario Education, Pg.20)

Initial placement should be provisional, to give students opportunities to demonstrate their knowledge and skills. In secondary school, equivalent credits for previous education,whether or not this is supported by documentation, should be awarded in accordance with policy defined in Ontario Secondary Schools,Grades 9-12: Program and Diploma Requirements (1999). However,secondary school placement may be independent of equivalent credits granted.For example, a student who had successfully completed the equivalent of Grade 10 in his or her home country would be granted 16 equivalent credits, but may not have the English language proficiency to successfully take Grade 11 courses exclusively.

(Ontario Education, Pg.21)

Integration into mainstream classrooms is an ongoing process. The amount of integration should increase over time as students become more proficient in English.

(Ontario Education, Pg.21)

Schools should continue tracking the progress of English language learners throughout their school careers. This will ensure that supports are provided when necessary and will provide demographic information for future planning

(Ontario Education, Pg.25)

Teachers will indicate, using the appropriate box on the report card, when modifications to curriculum expectations have been made to address the ESL or ELD needs of English language learners.

(Ontario Education, Pg. 26)

c) Programming

– English as a Second Language (ESL) programs, which are for students whose first language is other than English or is a variety of English significantly different from that used for instruction in Ontario schools. Students in these programs have had educational opportunities to develop age-appropriate first-language literacy skills; – English Literacy Development (ELD) programs, which are for students whose first language is other than English or is a variety of English significantly different from that used for instruction in Ontario schools. Students in these programs are most often from countries in which their access to education has been limited, and they have had limited opportunities to develop language and literacy skills in any language. Schooling in their countries of origin has been inconsistent,disrupted, or even completely unavailable throughout the years that these children would otherwise have been in school. As a result, they arrive in Ontario schools with significant gaps in their education;
– congregated classes for English language instruction, in the home school or other accessible school, for a significant portion of each school day;
 – individual assistance on a tutorial/resource basis; 
– core programs (English, social studies/history/geography,science, mathematics) taught by content-area teachers who also hold English as a Second Language Part 1 qualifications; 
– sections of secondary courses designated for English language learners (e.g., Canadian geography for newcomers);
-integration into mainstream classrooms with appropriate instructional support from the classroom teacher and/or anESL/ELD teacher;
– participation in courses that encourage a high level of student involvement but that do not require a high level of proficiency in English (e.g., music, health and physical education,international language programs in some of the community languages when possible);
 – participation in elementary and secondary international language programs;
 – increased opportunities to use technology in developing proficiency in English;
– online support;
 – peer tutoring and/or bilingual tutoring;
– a combination of some or all of the above.

(Ontario Education, Pg. 22-23)

English language learners at different stages of learning English and/or developing literacy in English will need program adaptations in order to be successful. Appropriate adaptations include:

 – modified expectations (e.g., modification of some or all of the course expectations, especially for students in the early stages of learning English or those who require ELD support). (Note: When learning expectations are modified, this must be clearly indicated on the student’s report card.);
 – a variety of accommodations related to instructional strategies (e.g., extensive use of visual cues, graphic organizers, peer tutoring; strategic use of students’ first languages);
– a variety of learning resources (e.g., use of visual materials,simplified texts, and bilingual dictionaries);
 – accommodations related to assessment strategies (see Section 2.8 for more details).

(Ontario Education Pg.23)

Board staff who coordinate ESL and ELD programs and services should hold specialist qualifications in English as a Second Language. When making staffing decisions, school boards should consider the number of English language learners in the board, and, in individual schools, the number who will require ESL or ELD programs and services. (See Ontario Regulation 184/97.)

(Ontario Education Pg.24)

All teachers are responsible for supporting academic success for all students – including English language learners. Classroom/subject teachers who have students in their classes who are English language learners are not required to hold English as a Second Language Part 1 qualifications. However, the school board should provide all teachers with opportunities for professional development in meeting the needs of English language learners. Teachers assigned to ESL and ELD programs/courses at both the elementary and secondary school level are required to hold English as a Second Language Part 1 qualifications. Teachers with positions of added responsibility in the area of ESL and ELD (e.g., ESL/ELD department heads in secondary schools, ESL/ELD consultants and coordinators) are required to possess a Specialist Certificate in English as a Second Language.

(Ontario Education, Pg.31)

d) OSSLT

All students, including English language learners, must successfully complete the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test (OSSLT) or the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Course. Learning expectations in the OSSLC may not be modified unless the English language learner has special education needs. The OSSLC, although it can be used to fulfil the compulsory English requirement for either Grade 11 or Grade 12, may not be accepted as the Grade 12 English entrance requirement for university or college programs. English language learners should be provided with support in planning their transition to postsecondary institutions or the workplace. Offering courses (including the OSSLC and Grade 12 English courses) in a special section for English language learners will enable teachers to provide specific accommodations that will support English language learner sas they work to meet secondary school diploma requirements.

(Ontario Education Pg.25)

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Spec Ed Pt.2: M7-National, Provincial and Local Organizations

You are required to search online for six different organizations:
  • Two national organizations (Must be Canadian)
  • Two provincial organizations (State the Province)
  • Two local organizations (Provide name of the major city(cities) for this organization- geographically close to where you teach)
 Post your chart  include: Name of Organization, Group Serviced, Description of Organization and Type of Assistance Offered (see example of chart below)
Read all posts made by your colleagues
~ Respond to at least TWO of your classmates' posts

Name
Group Serviced
Description of Organization
Types of Assistance Offered
Local Organizations
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care Program
(General)
The Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care Program (CAMHCP) provides clinical services for children and youth up to 17 years of age and their families.  Services include Inpatients, Outpatients, Day Treatment, and Eating Disorders and may be delivered by an inter-disciplinary team.  Teachers from the W.D. Sutton School of the Thames Valley District School Board also support some clinical areas.
Outpatients services offers assessment and treatment for children and adolescents with mental health difficulties of an internalizing nature, such as:
Anxiety disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder
Mood disorders including depression and bipolar disorder
Suicidal behaviours
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Psychotic disorders e.g. schizophrenia
Psychosomatic disorders
Acute symptoms of distress related to family or personal crisis, abusive experiences, and/or experiencing or witnessing traumatic events.
Hamilton Regional Indian Centre

First Nations
Aboriginal programming provides cultural access to a variety of services made available to those with aboriginal backgrounds.
Aboriginal cultural centre providing numerous programs including:
* Alternative education program for students

* Alcohol/drug program
* Criminal/Family Courtwork program
* Aboriginal Healing & Wellness Program: to ensure that the healing and wellness needs * Aboriginal Healthy Babies/Healthy Children Program
* Aboriginal Prenatal/Nutrition Program
* Akwe:go Program providing cultural activities for children 7 years – 12 years old employment supports
* Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and Nutrition Program
* Life Long Care Program
Provincial Organizations
FASD ONE
Individuals with FASD
A world where Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is prevented, and where individuals living with FASD have what they need to thrive.
Link people with FASD, caregivers and professionals to services and supports
Transfer knowledge and develop resources.
Create a sustainable, provincial organization that connects the FASD landscape.
Ontario Tech University
(University Campus Counsel and/or Psychotherapy office
(University Students) Individuals seeking counseling;
We are dedicated to supporting students' mental health throughout their time at the university. Connect with a mental health counsellor and learn about the wellness groups and initiatives that are available to you.
Professional, short-term individual counselling and therapy.
Local referrals to students who prefer or require long-term counselling/therapy.
Mental health consultations for students, staff, faculty and parents related to student mental health.
National Organizations
Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention
Individuals with depression/temptations to take their own life/individuals who are struck with grief after a traumatic experience
Group of people taking the chance to reach out to the nation and support those with traumatic experiences and/or depression to put an end to death by suicide
Counseling; referencing; immediate support; education of how to assist a friend who is contemplating death by suicide
Canadian Mental Health Association
(General) Public as a whole
An organization seeking to assist individuals who do not understand mental health and what a healthy mind looks like as well as individuals who are struggling with cognitive/psychological disorders
Crowd funding; fun raising; education of social stigmas to youth; education for individuals with various disorders; education for individuals living with people who have a disorder

When your 128GB "Aigo" iPhone/iPad USB just...quits?

I have this awesome USB for iPhone and iPad...well until it died today.

How it works; The disk can transfer files via USB function from cellphones to Laptops (naturally-its not some nerd wizardry or dark arts-just plain old supply and demand science)

Last use; student was moving a voice recording (for an assignment) to it so I could retrieve it and mark it on the laptop. Done this almost 1000 times...maybe that is the problem? Too much of something good-is bad?

Troubleshooting; I tried reformatting the disk; I tried plugging the disk into multiple devices. In all cases, it says the disk is there but it is "unrecognizable"; suggestion to reformat/format disk. I tried (FAT)-nothing.

I can still eject the disk safely though...

Thoughts; ugh-toast, but why?

I need to pick up the disk from work and try to follow this wikipage on diagnostics for the USB disk; updates to come.

https://www.wikihow.com/Fix-an-Unrecognized-USB-Disk

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Special Education M3: Catching up on "Ontario Legislation Pt.2"

Required Reading:
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onset/
http://www.sjto.gov.on.ca/
You are to read a decision from either link above CANLII or the Social Justice Tribunal of Ontario (related to special education).
If you have never read a legal document before this can be quite confusing. Make sure you are not reading the “Supplementary Decision” but the full case.
Here is an example of one you can use that was posted in CANLII
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onset/doc/2011/2011onset4/2011onset4.html

Module Task:
Choose a Special Education Tribunal Decision using one of the two sources above CANLII or the Social Justice Tribunal of Ontario.  It is strongly suggested that you look at the Decisions carefully before choosing. If you are in an elementary panel, you should chose a Decision related to elementary students. If you are in a rural area, you should find a Decision related to issues close or near to your board.   
  •   Write a two-page summary of the decision.  Make sure to include the URL link to the decision in case one of your classmates wants to read the entire docket.
  •   Outline and list the legislation or policies that are being contested.
  •   Outline and summarize the major issues of the parents and the school board.
  •   In your opinion, do you agree with the Tribunal’s decision?  What would you have done differently?  What suggestions do you have?

Post your summary
Read all posts made by your colleagues
~ Respond to at least TWO of your classmates' posts
_________________________________________________________________________________
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onset/doc/2018/2018onset1/2018onset1.html

This case is a more recent case (2019), a parent disagreed with the exceptionality/learning difficulty that their child was said to have based on the school board's (TDSB) documentations. It seemed that this whole process was drawn out due to a lack there of effective communication in the end. Parents were able to provide their own documentations to prove otherwise/further discussion. The fact that the OSET (as represented by Eva Nichols) was willing to hear the appeal says that there is likely some important information that needs to be mediated as well as a process that needs to be rectified.

To begin I agree with the tribunal's decision because although "lazy" and "negligent" attitudes to a situation like this are overbearing and unwarranted, they seem fitting on some level. It is important to note that the tribunal is not mean't to be the father figure between two children; they are mediators and also the level playing field in which recognizes that sometimes a party may get their head full of steam and simply see red or be unwilling to cooperate with the other party due to some bias/misunderstanding. In this case, the appeal is being made because there was no follow up to the decision and the school board is making a parent nervous with their "inaction". At some point the school board respondent must think to themselves that it would be better off allowing this to be appealed and argued than admittedly "taking no further actions". I think that the respondent had not intended this going to OSET, and was hoping to solve it in house first. However on the wiser side of the table the appellant (parent) decided that this is not an acceptable means to and end "allowing it to fester and then settling when the tribunal is getting involved". When the tribunal takes a step back and corrects the processing of paperwork that parents are normally drowning within as a part of this process; and then direct that the respondent and parent resolve on their own basis says that the OSET doesn't seek to punish but rectify a system that may have weak links within it. The idea would be that the respondent reflects on the process set out for parents and faculty members in a way that will help them ask the question of "what can we do to avoid this in the future?".

In regards to background sec.11, it was stated that the respondent had not shared any disagreement or misunderstandings with the respondent. I believe this is what characterizes the purpose of the tribunal. This is where the whole process falls apart in regards to IPRC; and other situations that take place over email based communications with the general public/parents. Step 1: Decision is made; Step 2: agree or disagree with decision; Step 3: Resolve after a second hearing; Step 4: Move on. This is how effective the process could be. Although it is regularly a timely process because of the number of individuals involved-there needs to be case processing banks that allow invested parties to refer to (case managers/process banks). If not, there are situations like this where a parent will hire a representative and the representative understands the meaning of timely. In which case, timely here is what becomes the folly of this due process. If the school boards were transparent with parents at the beginning and allowed for immediate actions to be taken (yes, there might be more IPRC meetings/appeals) but it would stay relatively in house rather than moving on to OSET which sets a bit of a negative reputation for a respondent.

In summary, the parent met with the IPRC and disagreed with the decision on the identification of the respondents, but agree on the placement for the student. After email communications the appeal was not processed and was left unresolved. The appeal didn't move on to SEAB, therefore the process was directed by the appellant into the path of OSET. In the end OSET decides to have the appellant correctly fill in noted forms and then resolve the dispute immediately with the respondent which likely came down to adjusting the identification of the child's exceptionality.

This particular case is a recent one (which is why I chose it) that had parents appealing a decision made by the TDSB. It demonstrates the need for an indepth look at case by case scenarios in which the school board may feel one way but a parent may feel they know better. It seems that further documentation was required to provide an accurate decision on the exceptionalities of a student. This could be that the parent wanted to see the school board doing more/less based on the recommendation/decision that was made by the school board. It is important to note that the parents in all cases are being notified that they may appeal their case if they are dissatisfied with the decision of a school board because that is how our government works to appeal to the people, by allowing everyone to have a voice. This freedom is what essentially makes this the Canadian system.

Monday, November 11, 2019

Spec Ed. Pt.2-M6: Test Observations / Statistics / Intelligence

Topic 1: Statistics - Interpreting

Explain the difference between raw score, percentile score, and standard score.

Raw Score: This is the original score that a patient or accessed individual have before their score is moved/shifted to different classifications

Percentile Score: Basically a comparison between where you stand based on your completion of the questions and where others stand around your score (higher or lower than you)

Standard Score: The score that provides an opportunity to see the data without outliers/with clear intentions of showing where the outliers stand in regards to a data batch. in regards to psychological testing, this could prove useful in determining a student's potentiality for particular behaviours in given situations.

Schools and teachers often want test results in terms of grade equivalents. How would you explain grade equivalents to avoid misunderstanding?

Grade equivalent scores refer to the abilities a student has based on their particular grade and the content that they are reviewing at that stage of the activity.

Grade equivalents in regards to test results may look like,

A child in grade 5 who is performing at a reasonable level (in mathematics) may be compared to another 5th grader (a classmate) who is completing algebra as well, but at a much lower level (maybe still developing an understanding of patterns and geometric shapes).

What is the difference between validity and reliability? Why are both important test qualities?

Validity: The relevance of the test criteria

Valid tests set out to measure a particular area of interest and the criteria are directly connected to the area of interest that the tests seek to evaluate.

Reliability: Consistent and understandable results with logical connections to results

Reliable tests are resulting in accurate and consistent data that the assessor can recognize 

Topic 2: Intelligence 
  1. What are some of the limitations of intellectual assessments?
essentially it comes down to physical and cognitive barriers; students who have severe disorders or challenges are not going to be able to produce the work/test to the level needed.
  1. In identifying and programming for a student, why do we always use an individual as opposed to a group intelligence test?  Is it ever appropriate to use a group test?
Group intelligence testing generally makes me think of standard pcertile and then the percentile as well. The programming may benefit from know.
  1. Under what circumstances would an intelligence test be a necessary part of an assessment?
It seems like intelligence testing and the multiple intelligences are sometimes combined to improve student classroom climate; likewise other important considerations while students are moving around are, their inclusion in activities and parental awareness in the classroom when one have the chance.

Topic 3: Your professional experiences
  1. Have you ever seen raw scores?
I have never seen raw scores myself unless it were data that I personally collected from a student in regards to anxiety assessments
  1. Intelligence testing results? 
I have never seen purposed/official intelligence testing results because the school I am working at has not needed them in my classrooms yet. These results usually come from tests like the Wechsler, in an example I came across online, the tests were being used to check for the level of "mental retardatoin"
  1. Were you able to interpret them? 
If I saw the data I believe I would be able to interpret the data relatively well as I have a natural knack for visual literacy.
  1. Were they useful to you as a classroom teacher?
I had not used/seen the test results, but if I were the classroom teacher-I would imagine that they mean nothing to me until they allow me to help my student/me to better understanding of my student. The limitations that some intelligence testing have provide varying levels of usefulness as well as difficulty which could eliminate them as reliable. The validity of certain intellectual assessments come into question though as depending on the level of intelligence/disorder a student may be experiencing, they may be unable to accurately or coherently complete the the testing.

Post your responses to the three questions from Topic 1 and Topic 2 (total of 6)
Post your experience as a teacher with issues related to intelligence testing Topic 3
Read all posts made by your colleagues
~ Respond to at least TWO of your classmates' posts
Total Online Hours: 8

references:
https://www.thoughtco.com/intelligence-testing-for-special-education-3110625

Tpic 1 and 2 edited:

Topic #1
Here I explain the difference between raw score, percentile score, and standard score.
Raw Score: This is the original score that a patient or accessed individual have before their score is moved/shifted to different classifications
Percentile Score: Basically a comparison between where you stand based on your completion of the questions and where others stand around your score (higher or lower than you)
Standard Score: The score that provides an opportunity to see the data without outliers/with clear intentions of showing where the outliers stand in regards to a data batch. in regards to psychological testing, this could prove useful in determining a student's potentiality for particular behaviours in given situations.
When Schools and teachers often want test results in terms of grade equivalents I explain grade equivalents to avoid misunderstanding in the following way, "Grade equivalent scores refer to the abilities a student has based on their particular grade and the content that they are reviewing at that stage of the activity".

Grade equivalents in regards to test results may look like the following example, "A child in grade 5 who is performing at a reasonable level (in mathematics) may be compared to another 5th grader (a classmate) who is completing algebra as well, but at a much lower level (maybe still developing an understanding of patterns and geometric shapes)."
The difference between Validity (The relevance of the test criteria) and Reliability (Consistent and understandable results with logical connections to results) is that valid tests set out to measure a particular area of interest and the criteria are directly connected to the area of interest that the tests seek to evaluate. Where as reliable tests are resulting in accurate and consistent data that the assessor can recognize. Its not to say that a test can only be valid OR reliable its a case by case situation.

Topic #2
The limitations of intellectual assessments are essentially coming down to physical and cognitive barriers; students who have severe disorders or challenges are not going to be able to produce the work/test to the level needed.  In identifying and programming for a student,  we always use an individual as opposed to a group intelligence test because every classroom has outliers. Group intelligence testing generally makes me think of standard score and then the percentile as well. The programming may benefit from knowing how an individual student is performing or struggling so the teacher can provide further testing/support in a particular area
It seems like intelligence testing and the multiple intelligences are sometimes combined to improve student classroom climate; likewise other important considerations while students are moving around are, their inclusion in activities and parental awareness in the classroom when one have the chance.